When having a RMarkdown file with something like `r 1.60e9`

, the resulting PDF output includes this number as 1.60 × 10⁹.

This is nearly perfect - I would prefer a dot (" · " using something like LaTeX's \cdot) as the sign for multiplication in between.

I'm guessing there's a neater way to get it done, but FYI, you *can* include LaTeX chunks in your R Markdown.

Can you give a snippet of code where you're producing this output, it's always easier to work with something akin to a reprex (short for minimal **repr**oducible **ex**ample).

After a bit of searching, it turns out there's a `toLatex`

function in the `sfsmisc`

package that will take care of this. After loading the package, you can type inline text like the following to render scientific notation with `\cdot`

.

```
$`r toLatex(y)`$
```

Or, to control significant digits and ensure scientific notation:

```
$`r toLatex(y, digits=3, scientific=TRUE)`$
```

**Original Answer**

There may be a more direct way to substitute a `\cdot`

for the `\times`

but here's a long-winded way (assuming `y`

is the previously defined value you want to render):

```
$`r round(y/10^floor(log10(y)), 2)` \cdot `r 10^floor(log10(y))`$
```

You can also package this into a function. Here's a complete `rmarkdown`

example.

`rmarkdown`

document

```
---
output: pdf_document
---
```{r}
y = 1.60e9
```
The result is $`r sprintf("%1.2f", y/10^floor(log10(y)))` \cdot `r 10^floor(log10(y))`$.
\vspace{0.5cm}
Package this into a function:
```{r}
cdot = function(x, digits=2) {
b = floor(log10(x))
paste0(sprintf(paste0("%1.", digits, "f"), x/10^b), " \\cdot 10^", b)
}
```
The result is $`r cdot(y)`$.
```

#### Output PDF

Hi joels,

Thanks a lot for your nice solution. It is a good workaround

It would be nice, if there would be a RMarkdown option which could globally switch the output for all chunks in a document as an improvement.

For future consultation of this topic, see about