Not /: but only "/". I used : colon in the comment as just a colon.
Now what part don't you understand ? In R code we can write a syntax like dplyr::count(), in long and complicated code I did not spot / as a connector for plots originated from patchwork, so my question was: what is so different in patchwork or syntax that I can't write it as follows:
patchwork::/
in order to know that / is not there as a math division symbol but function coming specifically from patchwork ?
Ah, okay. I see what you mean now. We probably need an R expert for this but my guess is that / is some kind of "primitive" in base R that is interpreted in context just as + is. It is not a function in {patchwork}. Does that make sense?