Hi, I used RMarkdown to write a paper. Frustratingly, I've noticed that results seem to change (when data/other things haven't changed), and when I ran RMarkdown to create two separate PDFs with knitr::opts_chunk$set(cache=TRUE) vs knitr::opts_chunk$set(cache=FALSE) the data is different. This doesn't make sense to me. I've also tried running Wickham's suggestion knitr::clean_cache(), but that doesn't seem to do much. It's not good have data turn out two different ways, and I'm wondering whether TRUE or FALSE is correct and why?
These are my header settings:
---
fig: no crop
geometry: left=1mm, right=1mm, top=1mm, bottom=1mm, asymmetric
indent: TRUE
output:
pdf_document: default
html_document:
df_print: paged
fig_caption: yes
includes:
in_header: my_header.tex
word_document: default
header-includes:
- \usepackage{placeins}
- \usepackage{indentfirst}
- \usepackage{setspace}\doublespacing
- \usepackage{lineno}
- \linenumbers
---
```{r echo = FALSE, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = FALSE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(dpi=300)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(warning=FALSE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(messages=FALSE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(fig.show="hold")
knitr::opts_chunk$set(strip.white=TRUE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(autodep = TRUE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(cache=TRUE)
knitr::opts_chunk$set(scientific=FALSE)
knitr::clean_cache()
scientific=FALSE
# knitr::clean_cache()
options(digits=3)
Thanks much!
James